Scarpa Vs La Sportiva
Who is King of The Climbing Shoe?
Good vs Bad, Ferrari vs Lamborghini, Messi vs Ronaldo – no matter where you look – there are always two opposing forces battling to reign supreme.
When it comes to climbing shoes, the two clashing titans are Scarpa vs La Sportiva. These two Italian powerhouses have been amongst the handful of companies that have been at the forefront of the climbing shoe revolution since it started heating up in the late 70s.
In many ways, La Sportiva and Scarpa are very similar. Both were founded in the early 20th century, within 10 years of one another. They originate from the Northern region of Italy, with their headquarters, and main manufacturing facilities, a mere two-hour drive away from each other. They are also the only shoe brands to have access to XS Grip 2, Vibram’s most coveted rubber compound. La Sportiva and Scarpa are also family-run businesses, both creating a range of high-quality outdoor footwear.
With so many similarities and both being renowned for creating awesome climbing shoes, how can we separate these two iconic shoemakers from one another? And which one should you look to for your next pair of climbing shoes?
In honesty, it’s no easy task settling the great La Sportiva vs Scarpa debate. Everyone has their own opinion on the matter.
Nevertheless, we will attempt to settle the Scarpa Vs La Sportiva argument once and for all. Let’s take a closer look at the shoes, technology, and athlete ambassadors and see if we can get to the bottom of this dispute.
Let’s start this head-to-head comparison by looking at the materials both companies use to make their climbing shoes.
Both Scarpa and La Sportiva prominently Vibram rubber for the vast majority of their shoes. Each company used all three of the Vibram climbing compounds available (Grip, Grip 2 and Edge).
Unsurprisingly, Grip 2 is the most used outsole rubber for both La Sportiva and Scarpa. What is surprising though is, by our count, both Scarpa and La Sportiva have eleven shoes that use the XS Grip 2 rubber. Again, both have one shoe that uses the XS Grip, the Scarpa Helix, and the La Sportiva Zenit. Spooky.
When it comes to the edging specialist, La Sportiva has 8 shoes in their current range that use XS Grip Edge, whereas Scarpa has 4.
Aside from Vibram, both companies have their own rubber compounds, although these are often reserved for their budget-friendly shoes. For Scarpa, their M50 compound is used on the toe box of the Drago, Chimera Furia models. They also have a super-sticky S-72 that is currently only used on the Veloce.
La Sportiva has its FriXion compounds, found on a few of their budget models like Trantualce, Aragon and Cobra.
La Sportiva likes their leather climbing shoes. All-round performance models like the Finale, Cobra, and Mythos use 100% leather uppers. Most of their shoes though use a hybrid of both synthetic and leather. The Solution, Skwama and Futura are just a few examples. Even the new Zenit, which predominantly uses a knit upper, has a suede insole. From what I can tell, there is only one shoe in the LS line that uses purely synthetic materials, the Corba 4.99.
SCARPA also has their fair share of all leather shoes; the Helix, Maestro Mid and Origin to name a few. Much like La Sportiva, the bulk of their most shoes are hybrids, such as the Instinct line, Drago and Arpia.
Interestingly, La Sportiva has no climbing shoes that are classed as vegan-friendly. Scarpa, on the other hand, has a number of vegan climbing shoes in their range, including the Veloce, Velocity, Vapor V, Boostic, Furia Air and Quantic.
Both Scarpa and La Sportiva have developed technology that has driven climbing shoe innovation over the decades. Some of these represented significant milestones in the evolution of climbing shoes.
La Sportiva has been know to introduce some pretty big designs over the years. They were one of the first shoemakers to commercially release innovations like heel rands, downturned profiles and slipper closures on their shoes. They have plenty of other great patented technology that boosts the performance of their shoes.
How well climbing shoes maintain their shape throughout their life is a crucial aspect of durability. One of La Sportiva’s favorite ways to do this is through the use of their P3 Platform.
The P3 Platform (Permanent Power Platform) has been a staple of La Sportiva’s modern performance shoes. This clever rand starts under the toe box, wraps around the back of the heel and back under the midfoot. This design ultimately maintains the shape of their shoe throughout its life, while also transitioning power throughout the shoe.
No Edge Technology
Another big piece of technology in the LS camp is their No-Edge technology. This revolutionized the way we think about edging. This design removes the traditional ‘sharp’ edges of a climbing shoe, and instead, allows the rubber to follow the natural profile of the foot. This offers a handful of benefits including improved sensitivity and increased surface area with the wall.
Scarpa has also been busy developing a boatload of shoe tech over the last few years, much of which has been put to good use in their most popular shoes like the Drago, Instinct VS, and Boostic. Here’s a few of our favorite Scarpa shoe tech.
Bi Tension Rand
Scarpa has essentially revered a traditional rand to allow for a secure toe box, without the need for toe crushing or extreme tension around the heel. This is widely used throughout the Scarpa shoe line, found on everything from all-round performers like the Vapour V to gym specialists like the Veloce.
PCB Tension System
If you have used the Drago or Chimera before, you will undoubtedly have noticed the colorful trip (either orange or blue) on the bottom of the shoe. This doesn’t just look cool, it has an important role in helping the shoes keep their downturned shape, as well as transferring power around the shoe
It’s pretty difficult, and often inaccurate, to make a general claim about Scarpa vs La Sportiva sizing.
This is predominantly because the size and shape of shoes are dedicated by the last it was built on. If you don’t know what a shoe last is, it’s simply the 3D foot mold the model was built around. This will determine the size, shape, width, and volume of your shoes (you can learn all about climbing shoes last here if you want).
If your foot fits the La Sportiva Tarantulace perfectly, this doesn’t necessarily mean buying the Skwama in the same size will guarantee the same fit. Why? Again, it all comes down to the last it was built around.
The Tarantualce uses the RL45 last, whereas the Skawma uses the PD75 (or the WPD75 for the women’s variation), two very different shapes.
La Sportiva uses 10 different last shapes to build their shoes, 3 of which are female (or lower-volume) variations. Scarpa, on the other hand, uses a whopping 20 different shapes, 9 of which are female-specific shapes.
Because of the huge range of lasts each company uses, with shapes made to cater to both wide and narrow feet, it is nearly impossible to compare the sizes of each company. That probably wasn’t the answer you were looking for. Sorry!
Noticeable Sends & Brand Ambassadors
Another way we might be able to settle the Scarpa vs La Sportiva debate is by having a look at the shoe choice of professional climbers and what they have used for their biggest ascents. Yes, there guys and gals are undoubtedly getting paid a nice chunk of change to wear these shoes, but I think it’s still a testament to the quality of a shoe if it’s topping out some serious ascents.
When it comes to noticeable ascents, it’s pretty hard to argue with La Sportiva’s credentials. For starters, you could pick any of the hundreds of ascents Ondra’s and you will see a pair of La Sportiva shoes on his feet, including his 9c ascent of Silence. The same goes for Tommy Caldwell and Alex Honnold on the Dawn Wall and Free Solo projects.
Nalle Hukkataival, arguably one of the greatest boulders ever, is also a big fan of the La Sportiva Solution and wears them for the vast majority of his boulder and sports projects.
Scarpa doesn’t quite have the team of big-name ambassadors that La Sportiva has, but there is still some serious talent floating around the Scarpa camp. Alex Puccio is a long-time team member, having made some of her biggest achievements, like topping four V14 boulders and winning gold at the IFSC World Cup. Magnus Midtbø, Robbie Phillips and Nina Williams are also some familiar faces in the Scarpa camp.
We recently logged over 1000 of the hardest sport ascents from the two decades and you can see both Scarpa and La Sportiva are leading the change
When it comes to competition climbing, unsurprising it’s also Scarpa VS La Sportiva battling to be king of the plastic. You might have noticed that for the Olympic 2020 games 13 climbers were wearing La Sportiva shoes, and 11 were using Scarpa.
The Scarpa Drago was also the single most popular shoe here, with over 25% of the athletes used the shoe for at least one discipline. That said, two La Sportiva Athletes bagged a podium position (Jakob Schubert and Akiyo Noguchi) compared to the single Scarpa athlete (Nathaniel Coleman).
Scarpa vs La Sportiva – What’s right for you?
I am unsure if our La Sportiva Vs Scarpa compassion helped make things clearer, or most likely, just created even more confusion.
At the end of the day though, both of these companies create a range of kick-ass climbing shoes, so you can really go wrong with either brand.
When it comes to you choosing your next pair of climbing shoes, the most important destination between Scarpa vs La Sportiva should be how well their shoes fit you foot. Like I mentioned earlier, these companies use over 30 different shapes between. Find the shape that gives you the best fit and that’s the brand for you!